Thesaurus and hierarchical pick-lists of keywords
Hello everybody,
We would like in several research projects (on biodiversity and agriculture) share our bibliography through Zotero.
In our experience, letting everybody free to add his own tags / keywords introduce huge noise and rapidly nobody else can effectively use the bibliography database.
We thus would like to build our bibliographic data-base "around" a mandatory thesaurus of keywords / tags hierarchically ordered.
Moreover using standardized tags / keywords should let us exchange information with international data-bases such as those using e.g. Agrovoc of the FAO, the GBIF keywords, taxonomic databases or the Inspire European based databases.
It would also train our colleagues in using appropriate and normed tags / keywords for both papers searches and their publication indexing.
We thus would like to use - through a user-friendly data entry form - a common thesaurus with hierarchical keywords proposed in pick-lists. Ideally this thesaurus should be "uploaded" from either Word list or CSV files for changes / updates when needed.
Moreover, we would like this interface impede end-users to automatically integrate keywords from e.g. bibliography search platforms or scientific journals to avoid increasing the noise due by integrating non-standardized keywords.
I was wondering whther such an interface / plugin would exist as we certainly are not alone to look for standardized keywords / tags in our bibliographic database.
If such tool is not available, I am looking for people who would be able to develop such interface / pugin to Zotero
Best regards
Yves
Senior scientist, not computer man...
We would like in several research projects (on biodiversity and agriculture) share our bibliography through Zotero.
In our experience, letting everybody free to add his own tags / keywords introduce huge noise and rapidly nobody else can effectively use the bibliography database.
We thus would like to build our bibliographic data-base "around" a mandatory thesaurus of keywords / tags hierarchically ordered.
Moreover using standardized tags / keywords should let us exchange information with international data-bases such as those using e.g. Agrovoc of the FAO, the GBIF keywords, taxonomic databases or the Inspire European based databases.
It would also train our colleagues in using appropriate and normed tags / keywords for both papers searches and their publication indexing.
We thus would like to use - through a user-friendly data entry form - a common thesaurus with hierarchical keywords proposed in pick-lists. Ideally this thesaurus should be "uploaded" from either Word list or CSV files for changes / updates when needed.
Moreover, we would like this interface impede end-users to automatically integrate keywords from e.g. bibliography search platforms or scientific journals to avoid increasing the noise due by integrating non-standardized keywords.
I was wondering whther such an interface / plugin would exist as we certainly are not alone to look for standardized keywords / tags in our bibliographic database.
If such tool is not available, I am looking for people who would be able to develop such interface / pugin to Zotero
Best regards
Yves
Senior scientist, not computer man...
Would also not be a simple feat to develop, starting with the fact that the concept of hierarchical tags doesn't exist in Zotero and probably couldn't be introduced via plugin (since anything that affects database structure would break syncing).
Not saying it can't be done and I certainly understand the use case, just saying that you're looking at serious development work here, not a small coding job.
Alternatively, would it be possible to manipulate directly the list of tags and for instance to replace it by a list of tags which would be directly be proponed to the end-users?
Any news regarding this topic?
Should we better give up the idea of getting this feat into Zotero in a foreseeable future?
Many thanks and best regards,
Frédérique
Maintaining this tool will require frequent updates by some agreed-upon authority. How likely is that? In addition to my own thesaurus efforts, I serve on the advisory committees of two other thesauri. Neither of these strives for consensus but only ideas and opinions to be implemented by those with ultimate responsibility.
In the US there are several thesauri of the above mentioned disciplines: Medicine- Medline/PubMed uses MeSH; psychology- PsycInfo has its own thesaurus; education has ERIC and its thesaurus; transportation has TRID (an integration of the European ITRD and US TRIS databases) and its Transportation Research Thesaurus; agriculture has AGRICOLA and its thesaurus; and so on. The interesting and troublesome problem here is that terms for similar concepts in these thesauri are positioned quite differently in the hierarchies. This is because the hierarchical or other relatedness of concepts are thought of differently by those in different professions when seeking information.
In Agatha Christy's Poirot novels, the character Miss Lemon seeks the perfect file and indexing system so much so that she dreams of it at night. I can sometimes identity with that.