Upgrade StorageStyle Errors: Implementation Science
There seem to be a few errors in the Implementation Science bibliography output:
1) Nothing should be bolded or italicized, regardless of type,
2) A journal article reference should be structured as follows:
Smith JJ. The world of science. Am J Sci. 1999;36(3):234-5.
**Note that no spaces should be added between the year, volume, issue, or page numbers.
3) A book section should include page numbers, the editors, and the full book title as below:
Wyllie AH, Kerr JFR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, Jeon KW, editors. International review of cytology. London: Academic; 1980. p. 251-306.
4) Citations in the reference list should include all named authors, up to the first six before adding 'et al.'.
An endnote style file and additional examples are available on their website: http://www.implementationscience.com/authors/instructions/research#formatting-references.
Thank you!
1) Nothing should be bolded or italicized, regardless of type,
2) A journal article reference should be structured as follows:
Smith JJ. The world of science. Am J Sci. 1999;36(3):234-5.
**Note that no spaces should be added between the year, volume, issue, or page numbers.
3) A book section should include page numbers, the editors, and the full book title as below:
Wyllie AH, Kerr JFR, Currie AR. Cell death: the significance of apoptosis. In: Bourne GH, Danielli JF, Jeon KW, editors. International review of cytology. London: Academic; 1980. p. 251-306.
4) Citations in the reference list should include all named authors, up to the first six before adding 'et al.'.
An endnote style file and additional examples are available on their website: http://www.implementationscience.com/authors/instructions/research#formatting-references.
Thank you!
-
zuphilipYes, they changed their citation format. It should be https://www.zotero.org/styles/?q=springer vancouver brackets now.
-
vhapalrodriaExcellent, thank you!
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.