Chicago (full note): problem with shortened titles
My problem is that titles are only shortened if they directly follow the note in which the title in full is mentioned (often in a series of references, so no ibidem then). However, when that title was referred to in full a couple of notes earlier, it again produces a full note while I would prefer a shortened note and also think this is how the Chicago style prescribes it. This kind of crowds my notes. Any thoughts? Would really appreciate it!
I use Zotero 4.0.22 (automatically updated)
And the Word plug in 3.1.17 (also automatically updated)
I use Zotero 4.0.22 (automatically updated)
And the Word plug in 3.1.17 (also automatically updated)
That's unlikely to fix this, though. Can you replicate this in a new document just limiting yourself to 2 different items (i.e. cite them A A B B A B A B to test out all scenarios).
Did you manually edit any of the footnotes?
I'll check why it doesn't automatically update (I use the Firefox add-on), even though I checked that box. It might be because I work from a university computer and I don't have full control over what I can download/update or not. Otherwise I'll manually update through the site, I guess?
I tried replicating the error as you suggested and then it actually works fine. It shortens titles as it should, also if I complicate it a bit further (referring to B and C in one note and then in the following note to A again). However, in my own text, the first full note is often a few pages away and then it seems to forget that it has been referred to in full already.
I only edited a note which contains three references from the same author (who goes by a very long name) and I wanted to refer to the author as "idem" - even though I am not sure this is Chicago-style-proof.
Would you have any more suggestions?