Upgrade StorageAnnual Review of Biochemistry
I'm having an issue with the Annual Review of Biochemistry style from the repository. The format specification calls for inclusive page numbers for journal articles in the bibliography, but I'm only getting the first page. I do get inclusive page numbers for book chapters.
How can I get inclusive page numbers for journal articles for this format?
Here is the relevant portion of the format specification:
"6. Volume, issue or number (if any) in parentheses, then a colon and inclusive page numbers; if there is no volume number, inclusive page numbers preceded by a comma and “pp.” Do not repeat hundreds digit unless, e.g., 3–10, 71–77, 100–9, 331–35, 1002–3, 1198–202, 1536–38.
EXCEPTION: For Nuclear and Particle Science you need list only the first page of a chapter or article. For example: 10(4):123."
I'm using Zotero 4.0.12 for FF w/ MS Word 2010. Thanks in advance for any assistance.
How can I get inclusive page numbers for journal articles for this format?
Here is the relevant portion of the format specification:
"6. Volume, issue or number (if any) in parentheses, then a colon and inclusive page numbers; if there is no volume number, inclusive page numbers preceded by a comma and “pp.” Do not repeat hundreds digit unless, e.g., 3–10, 71–77, 100–9, 331–35, 1002–3, 1198–202, 1536–38.
EXCEPTION: For Nuclear and Particle Science you need list only the first page of a chapter or article. For example: 10(4):123."
I'm using Zotero 4.0.12 for FF w/ MS Word 2010. Thanks in advance for any assistance.
-
aurimas@adamsmith, could you change this, it must have propagated somehow from Nuclear and Particle Physics. I don't want to go through a pull request for a tiny change like that.
-
aurimasShould be fixed now. You can update your styles via Preferences... -> General -> Update Now
-
adamsmith(sorry about that)
-
aurimasThat's alright, it turned out to be more than one line. I figured you were busy :-)
-
cjoldfieldThanks for the fix, much appreciated.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.