Upgrade StorageVancouver style sorted alphabetically
I'm sure it has been done: I am submitting an article to the Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine journal. They request referencing in a "modified Vancouver" format, with the references listed alphabetically in the bibliography. The standard in Zotero is a sequential listing. How can I resort please?
Any suggestions gratefully received. Many thanks.
DrMD.
Quoted requirements:
"The journal uses a modified Vancouver style for references (the references must be listed alphabetically and the month and number can be omitted in journals that continuously paginate throughout the year).
The alphabetically listed references should be numbered, and then cited by number in the text or the tables and figure legends. The titles of cited journals should be abbreviated as in the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s Medline, (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/). Electronic sources should be cited in the same style using the guidelines of the American Psychological Association (www.apastyle.org/elecref.html). Examples of correct format for many different types of references can be downloaded from the journal's web site."
Any suggestions gratefully received. Many thanks.
DrMD.
Quoted requirements:
"The journal uses a modified Vancouver style for references (the references must be listed alphabetically and the month and number can be omitted in journals that continuously paginate throughout the year).
The alphabetically listed references should be numbered, and then cited by number in the text or the tables and figure legends. The titles of cited journals should be abbreviated as in the U.S. National Library of Medicine’s Medline, (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/). Electronic sources should be cited in the same style using the guidelines of the American Psychological Association (www.apastyle.org/elecref.html). Examples of correct format for many different types of references can be downloaded from the journal's web site."
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
Let us know if something is not correct.