double surnames alphabetical order in bibliography [solved]
Hello all,
I have discovered that in my bibliography (using the European Archaeology style) one of my authors, "De Laet" is inserted alphabetically with in the "Ls" whereas in this case, my reviewers would like to see it with the "Ds". So currently the order of double surnames is being defined by the second word of the surname and I would like it to be defined by the first word.
Is there a flag to change / override this in the style so that the order is always based on the first word of the surname or to edit the record for the paper so that zotero recognises the "De" as part of the name in this instance not a prefix (such as "van der")?
Many thanks for reading,
Rebecca
I have discovered that in my bibliography (using the European Archaeology style) one of my authors, "De Laet" is inserted alphabetically with in the "Ls" whereas in this case, my reviewers would like to see it with the "Ds". So currently the order of double surnames is being defined by the second word of the surname and I would like it to be defined by the first word.
Is there a flag to change / override this in the style so that the order is always based on the first word of the surname or to edit the record for the paper so that zotero recognises the "De" as part of the name in this instance not a prefix (such as "van der")?
Many thanks for reading,
Rebecca
demote-non-dropping-particle
tonever
, as an attribute in thecs:style
tag.Thanks all for the responses. I have got the bibliography looking just the way I want now. :)
I am actually working with my own modified version of the European Archaeology style to fit with my University's requirements. I am trying to persuade the Uni to validate my style officially so that I can get it published here but they are a bit wedded to Endnote so my requests for it to be double checked have always gone unanswered. :(
Cheers,
Rebecca
Sorry to warm up this old discussion but I have exactly the same problem (using MLA style) with 'De Quincey', who figures at the letter Q in my bibliography instead of D.
Now, I don't know where I can find and change the cs:style tag mentioned in one of the responses. More generally, where can I configure the style I am using, in case I need to adapt something. Does that make sense at all if one is not familiar with codes?
Thanks a lot,
Markus
Otherwise - yes, this is absolutely doable for someone who has never looked at any code:
First have a look here:
http://www.zotero.org/support/dev/citation_styles/style_editing_step-by-step
Then open the MLA style (or the style you want to change) in the Zotero test pane. Right on the top, in the second line, you'll see
<style xmlns="http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl" class="in-text" version="1.0" demote-non-dropping-particle="sort-only">
change that to
<style xmlns="http://purl.org/net/xbiblio/csl" class="in-text" version="1.0" demote-non-dropping-particle="never">
(i.e. change "sort-only" to "never")
and follow the instructions for getting the style back into Zotero.
"With some exceptions, especially in English-language contexts, French de following a first name or a title such as Mme or duc is not used with the last name alone.
La Boétie (Étienne de La Boétie)
Maupassant (Guy de Maupassant)
Nemours (Louis-Charles d'Orléans, duc de Nemours)
but
De Quincey (Thomas De Quincey) [Hey, I didn't know he is actually mentioned in the MLA guide. How exciting... ;)]
When the last name has only one syllable, however, de is usually retained
de Gaulle (Charles de Gaulle)"
If I understand this correctly De Quincey is an exception (the only one?), as is any single syllable surname, and if there are other names with this prefix in the bibliography they have to follow other rules.
Can I adapt the style to recognize exceptions to this rule or could this even be implemented in the style in the repository?
Cheers,
Markus
No, unfortunately you can't specify an exception. You'll have to fix this manually at the end.
Thanks for your help!
Enclosing De Quincey in quotation marks ("De Quincey") in the author field of the zotero info tab does not make a difference. I tried single quotation marks, but this also leaves the item in the same position in the bibliography and adds double quotation marks.
This obviously isn't the way we want this to work, but if you can check to see whether that works at your end, it would be very helpful.
Many thanks!
Actually De Quincey might not be the only problematic case. I had a look at MLA 7 and it also depends on the language of the name. Thus 'Guy de Maupassant' (French) would be listed under the letter M but 'De Sica' (Italian) under the letter 'D'. De Sica furthermore would come after 'Descartes', meaning that the space is not considered in alphabetization (as in the case of 'De Quincey').
We'll need to check more deeply, but it looks like that's what's happening here. I get the correct sort order with Chicago Fullnote, as shown in this screenshot:
http://imgur.com/r6zpF
This is under Linux, with Firefox 12.0 with Multilingual Zotero (MLZ). There is a small possibility that the more recent CSL processor version in MLZ is sorting better than the version currently in mainstream Zotero. Otherwise, the reason must be that the collation is failing on your system for some reason (and falling back to a binary string sort), but not failing on mine.
Shall we look into this further together? I would be asking you to install a plugin, run some simple trials and send back some log data from Zotero.
Concerning the bibliography update. I could refresh the document, which was sufficient to move 'De Quincey' up to the letter 'D'. I did not have to insert the bibliography again. Testing the various possibilities, it seems to me that a restart of Firefox is necessary. Word does not necessarily have to be restarted.
Firefox version
Operating system
Zotero version
Style
Firefox 15.0.1
Mac OSX 10.7.5
Zotero 3.0.8
MLA Style
I also work on a Windows computer (Windows 7) in my office, with the same results. I believe I have the same Firefox and Zotero versions there but I would have to check next week.
I checked CMS for sort-order guidance. I was unable to find a sample bibliography on this point, but I did find a link to the Unicode Collation Algorithm at CMS 16.67 (16th edn.). Unfortunately, the algorithm specification only tells us what is possible, not what is correct. The possible variations are many and subtle -- there is a table in Section 3.2.2 of the specification that is worth a look.
For the MLA example you cite, it would work as a hack to just remove all spaces from sort keys in the processor, but I'm not sure whether that would produce incorrect results in other locales (or possibly other styles). A better solution would be to handle the comparison weights entirely in the collation, since languages may vary in their treatment of the space (and other characters), but that may not be feasible, since the processor has no control over that end of the infrastructure.
Let me open a discussion on the CSL development list, and we'll see where that leads us.
http://cldr.unicode.org/index/cldr-spec/collation-guidelines