Now that Webkit is fully opensource... Zotero for Safari

Christophe S
Hello,

Sorry to ask about something that was already asked plenty of times and answered in the FAQ, but the main reason was about the "non-open" code from others browsers. So, now that Apple released the full source code of Safari as open source, would it be possible to think about a Zotero for Safari?
  • dstillman
    The FAQ entry may be a bit misleading. The open-source, cross-platform nature of Firefox was a primary consideration in our choosing it as a platform, but it is the Mozilla platform's extensibility, with technologies like XUL, JS, XPCOM and mozStorage, that allows us to create Zotero. Safari doesn't have an extension architecture: Safari "extensions" are unsupported hacks that rely on private, undocumented, reverse-engineered APIs (which is why they often break between versions). They're also compiled, Mac-only bundles built in Cocoa/Objective-C, as opposed to cross-platform, script-based extensions. And, of course, there's no Linux version of Safari at all.

    Also, for what it's worth, Safari isn't open-source; WebKit, the underlying engine, is. In other words, you can't build your own version of Safari.
  • Timoslav
    Hi guys,

    I guess there is a new reason to discuss the Safari issue. Now, that Apple released the Safari Extension Gallery, it could be possible to provide custom extensions. What about Zotero? Some news about that?

    Thx!
  • ajlyon
    No. The current development team doesn't have the resources to completely rewrite Zotero. As has been stated time and again, motivated developers or deep-pocketed supporters are welcome to work on extensions for other browsers that could interface with stand-alone Zotero (which will run in XULRunner or Firefox) or with the server.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.