Styles "Pharmacology" and "Nephron" need update

from Karger Guidlines: "In the text identify references by Arabic numerals [in square brackets]." At the moment, I get round brackets "(1)". Since the style seems to be a copy of "Vancouver", it's not possible for me to do that. Who can help?
  • I can have a look, but in the meantime, there is a "Vancouver with Brackets" style in the repository that should work for you.
  • Thanks a lot! Looking closer it seems that the requirements for Karger (Pharmacology, Nephron) are not "Vancouver" at all...
  • I've commited a style called "Karger Journals" which should show up in the repository soon.
    Please test and report back - once I hear back from you I'll fix the links from the other Karger journals.
    You'd do me a big favor if you could check which journals follow the same style and which of those are already in the repository.
  • any feedback on this as well as a list of journals would still be appreciated.
  • another try? I'd really like to finish this...
  • I just committed all current Karger Journals as dependent styles.
  • adamsmith: Might want to check that commit.
  • oops! Working on fixing that asap...
  • fixed - apologies, shouldn't have done this so quickly.
  • Those are all still showing up as invalid for some reason. Let me know if that's incorrect.
  • Haven't validated anything, but it looks like the "class" attribute is missing from cs:style.
  • ok, that should do it.
  • Hi,
    Some Karger journals are totally different: for ex Audiology and Neurology requests the citation as Author-Date in square brackets instead of numbers as in the generic Karger Style. I’am trying but not really sure of me…
  • it'd be great if you could manage - any problems just ask here.
    To share when you're done, see here:
    http://www.zotero.org/support/dev/citation_styles/sharing_styles
  • OK, I've committed a second Karger style and switchted Audiology and Neurotology to that. If anyone finds any other styles that are incorrect that's always appreciated.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.

Sign In or Register to comment.