Repeating Citation-string in Bibliography

thmaier
I'm a currently working on an adapting the german DIN1505-2 style mentioned here:
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/1857/din-1505-citation-style-your-opinion-wanted/

In particular I would like to change it in to an Author / Year style with footnotes. While this has worked out quite well, I'm a little stuck with two details.

I would like to repeat the Citation-string in the bibliograpy. It should look this:

Citation Footnote:
Author1 2009

Bibliography Entry:
Author1 2009
Author1, Author2, Author2: Paper Title in: Journal Name 14 (2009): 1734-46

Is there a way to achive this?

Second point would be how to change the and attribute to something else than "and" or "&".

Thanks.
  • adamsmith
    <text macro="author-short">
    <date prefix=" " variable="issued">
    <date-part name="year" suffix="
    "/>
    </date>

    including the line break.
    For and look into defining terms
    http://www.zotero.org/support/dev/csl_syntax_summary#terms
  • thmaier
    Thanks for the really quick reply.

    I managed two implement it according to your suggestion.

    But I guess any "et-al-min" or "et-al-use-first" definitions apply to the complete bibliography.

    I would like an exact duplicate of the citation entry. Using the example above:

    Author1 2009

    instead of

    Author1, Author2, Author2 2009.

    If I understand the following post correctly this feature will be included soon using the "citation-label" variable.
    http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/9141/display-only-the-first-author-in-a-homemade-citation-style/

    Will this be any time soon?

    In both cases it would be nice to have "real" line break between Author Year and the rest, since the Author Year parts spans across a complete line if i use center justification. Is there a way to achive this?

    I tested the display=block attribute but it didn't really did what I thought it would.

    Thanks.

This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Instead of commenting here, you should start a new discussion. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.