Edit elsevier-with-titles so that it uses subsequent-author-substitute
I have tried to edit the https://www.zotero.org/styles/elsevier-with-titles style so that it uses the "subsequent-author-substitute" rules to replace identical names with, e.g., "-----" (cf. https://docs.citationstyles.org/en/stable/specification.html#reference-grouping ).
But all my attempts failed… :-(
For instance, I thought that
bibliography entry-spacing="0" second-field-align="flush" subsequent-author-substitute="_____" subsequent-author-substitute-rule="complete-all"
would be the right way of doing it, but it does not change the way the references are displayed…
But all my attempts failed… :-(
For instance, I thought that
bibliography entry-spacing="0" second-field-align="flush" subsequent-author-substitute="_____" subsequent-author-substitute-rule="complete-all"
would be the right way of doing it, but it does not change the way the references are displayed…
bibliography hanging-indent="true" et-al-min="11" et-al-use-first="7" subsequent-author-substitute="———" entry-spacing="0"
but it does not behave as expected either.
I'd also just point out that doing something in a style meant for public consumption that is so unusual that it's never come up in CSL (I'm guessing the code in the style you link to is actually unintentionally left from copying Chicago author-date) is not a great idea in terms of readability. It's just going to confuse readers and you're basically saving ~3 characters over using firstauthor, initial, et al.
That makes sense now that you said it.
> I'd also just point out that doing something […] that is so unusual that it's never come up in CSL […] is not a great idea in terms of readability.
Probably true, too.
> you're basically saving ~3 characters over using firstauthor, initial, et al.
No, I would be replacing
LastName, A. et al
with
---
so, saving more than 3 characters. But that's probably not the point: you are right that this is probably a bad idea to begin with.