Missing features for "egxotic" style
My faculty has quite original citation style.
Citation is in format [AfnYyC], where:
Afn is...
1) when only one author, then Afn - first three letters of last name. (e.g. [Afn05])
2) when two authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names. (e.g. [AB05])
3) when three authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names. (e.g. [ABC05])
4) when more than three authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names followed by + sign. (e.g. [ABC+05])
Yy - short year format (no problem for this one).
C - "a", "b", "c" etc. - used when AfnYy is non-unique (e.g. [Afn05a] and [Afn05b]) - no problem here as well.
So as you can see, it is impossible to create this style due to CSL limitations.
Solutions anyone?
My thoughts:
1) I would upvote for IF statement for author-count. "+" sign problem could be solved either using IF author-count or "localizing"/changing "et al." value to "+".
2) substring method or attribute for author.
Let me know if it is somehow possible. Looking forward to your ideas. Thanks.
Citation is in format [AfnYyC], where:
Afn is...
1) when only one author, then Afn - first three letters of last name. (e.g. [Afn05])
2) when two authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names. (e.g. [AB05])
3) when three authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names. (e.g. [ABC05])
4) when more than three authors, then Afn - first letter for each of their last names followed by + sign. (e.g. [ABC+05])
Yy - short year format (no problem for this one).
C - "a", "b", "c" etc. - used when AfnYy is non-unique (e.g. [Afn05a] and [Afn05b]) - no problem here as well.
So as you can see, it is impossible to create this style due to CSL limitations.
Solutions anyone?
My thoughts:
1) I would upvote for IF statement for author-count. "+" sign problem could be solved either using IF author-count or "localizing"/changing "et al." value to "+".
2) substring method or attribute for author.
Let me know if it is somehow possible. Looking forward to your ideas. Thanks.
This is an old discussion that has not been active in a long time. Before commenting here, you should strongly consider starting a new discussion instead. If you think the content of this discussion is still relevant, you can link to it from your new discussion.
If yes, I would be thankful if you could share it.
Thanks a lot,
Marc
[Kim07]
[Kim09a]
[Kim09b]
Is someone aware of such a style?
(Or a script which can put this format into the extra field? )
Thanks a lot
(another) Marc
P.S:
Missing feature: In the preview in the style repository one cannot see what the citation will look like. (Would be interesting in such non-trivial cases)