Not signed in (Sign In)
Vanilla 1.1.5a is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
-
- CommentAuthoruvaquiche
- CommentTimeJul 16th 2008
One of my chapters is composed of multiple interviews with two people. When I am citing these sources in Word (2007) in footnotes (Chicago Style), Zotero does not include the date when a source is cited for the second time. This means that the sources are all appearing as the same, when in fact they are different interviews. I wouldn't mind adding the date manually, BUT if I cite a source and think it will be the first time I am using that particular interview, and then in the editing process the sentences get moved around, I will no longer know which particular interview a citation came from if it is not noted correctly anymore.
Example:
First time interview is cited in text: Rose Hill, interviewed by Mary Davis, transcript, May 13, 1928, University of Virginia Special Collections
Next citation:
Rose Hill, interview
Problem:
No date to distinguish between-
First cite:
Rose Hill, interviewed by Mary Davis, transcript, June 4, 1928, University of Virginia Special Collections
Second cite:
Rose Hill, interview
Any ideas or should I just go with the manual add of date until there is a fix?
Thanks!
(I rewrote this entry because I hadn't received a comment yet. I think I posted the entry in the wrong place at first!) -
- CommentAuthorTjowens
- CommentTimeJul 16th 2008
What happens if you use the Full Note Chicago Manual of Style format. That should always stick in the full citation. -
- CommentAuthoruvaquiche
- CommentTimeJul 29th 2008
I tried the Full Note Chicago Manual of Style format and the problem persists. For now I will just put the date in the edit tool (unless you know of another fix) until Zotero is next updated...I hope you do get a chance to address this in the near future! I just discovered the edit tool and that is useful.
The second citation of any interview, when there are multiple interviews with the same subject and interviewer, should read:
Rose Hill, interview, May 13, 1928
Thanks,
uvaquiche -
- CommentAuthorerazlogo
- CommentTimeJul 29th 2008
Well, this is really a shortcoming of CSL. Since the date should only be added if there are multiple interviews with the same subject and interviewer, there should be something like disambiguate-add-date option in CSL. -
- CommentAuthoruvaquiche
- CommentTimeJul 29th 2008
What is CSL? -
- CommentAuthorTjowens
- CommentTimeJul 30th 2008
-
- CommentAuthorerazlogo
- CommentTimeAug 5th 2008
This issue is now added to an open ticket.
1 to 7 of 7